Breaking! 37 Organizations Rally To Urge Release Of 2 Endangered Wolves Caught By Federal Trappers In New Mexico

Photo from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Thirty-seven organizations sent a letter yesterday urging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to free two endangered wolves trapped in New Mexico and to halt additional trapping.

Federal trappers recently removed two Mexican Gray Wolves from the wild and set traps for a third wolf that was allegedly preying on cattle in the Gila National Forest. Because the removal undermines wolf recovery, the letter urges the Service to cancel the removal order and promptly release the captured wolves back into the wild.

“Wolves can’t be recovered with traps and bullets,” Michael Robinson, Senior Conservation Advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity said in a statement. “Mexican wolves are closer to extinction than the government admits. Removing wolves to placate the livestock industry is the last thing we should be doing to this profoundly endangered population.”

The Fish and Wildlife Service has refused to release its removal order to the public. But the agency has acknowledged that the order authorizes the killing of a wolf or multiple wolves.

“Given the excessive losses to the wolf population in the last year from unlawful killing, traps and other unknown causes, it’s crucial that this wolf’s life be spared,” said Mary Katherine Ray, Wildlife Chair for the Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club. “A kill order is contrary to the goal of the recovery of this highly imperiled species.”

The Mexican wolf is one of the most endangered mammals in North America, with two reintroduced populations in Mexico and the U.S. Southwest, and roughly 300 captive wolves.

Federal trapping and shooting on behalf of the livestock industry has kept the population low since reintroduction began in Arizona and New Mexico in 1998. In 2017, 114 wolves were counted in the wild. The Fish and Wildlife Service will soon release 2018 numbers. In Mexico, approximately 35 wolves stem from a reintroduction program that began in 2011.

The letter from conservation groups points out the inequity in the Service ignoring the advice of scientists, and allowing wolves to scavenge on livestock carcasses, and then scapegoating wolves when they begin to prey on cattle near where they scavenged.

“This area is good habitat for wolves, but clearly not such a great place for livestock,” said Greta Anderson, Deputy Director of Western Watersheds Project. “Real conflict reduction would mean permanently closing the allotment and allowing wildlife to be wild on our public lands.”

It is not known if those circumstances precipitated the present conflicts. But in the past, the Rainy Mesa area has seen repeated incidents of cattle dying from non-wolf causes and then being scavenged by wolves. Wolves then began preying on livestock and suffered the consequences.

A list of the organizations, as well as a copy of the letter, can be found HERE!

More on this topic

Popular stories

Watch The Premiere Of “Dog Nation” With Cesar Millan On Nat Geo WILD This Friday March 3rd

Renowned dog behaviorist Cesar Millan is taking a coast to coast Road trip with his son, Andre, in an all new show Cesar Millan’s...

Foreign Tourists Are Fueling Animal Cruelty In Vietnam’s Tourism Industry; Sign Petition To Demand That The Government End This Travesty

Investigation into a Vietnamese tourist company exploiting endangered species reveals foreign tourists are a mainstay of the audience. In the Vietnamese tourism hotspot of Nha...

Breaking! Ricky Gervais Teams Up With In Defense Of Animals For Fur Free Friday; Calls For Saks & Neiman Marcus To Stop Selling Fur!

In Defense of Animals has joined forces with world-renowned animal advocate and comedian Ricky Gervais to educate shoppers about the true cost of fur and to...