Hormel Foods Settles Lawsuit Over Deceptive Advertising Of “Natural Choice” Products While Still Killing Animals In Factory Farms

The Animal Legal Defense Fund recently filed a motion to dismiss its lawsuit against Hormel Foods regarding its advertising for Natural Choice brand products as its disputes have been resolved.

The lawsuit, filed in June 2016, together with Public Justice, alleges that Hormel Foods misleads consumers through the advertising of its Natural Choice brand of lunch meats and bacon by advertising the products as “natural” while they still come from animals raised in the worst factory farms that employ additives, hormones, antibiotics, and contain ingredients that constitute artificial preservatives. All of which are in violation of the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (DCCPPA).

As part of the resolution, Hormel Foods has published additional information on its website to help consumers understand the terms Hormel Foods uses on its product labels and in its advertisements. Hormel Foods also agreed to include explanatory language in future advertisements for Hormel Natural Choice products.

Discovery during the lawsuit proceedings revealed that Hormel advertises these products as “natural” and represents that the pigs used for this line of products are treated differently than pigs in its other products, even though the animals in Natural Choice brand products are also raised in factory farms, and given antibiotics, including bambermycin and/or virginiamycin, and other chemicals such as chlorine and Termin-8 acid, a feed disinfectant containing formaldehyde and propionic acid.

Additional documents produced by Hormel reveal that there is also nothing “natural” about the way the company treats animals, including pregnant mother pigs being confined to gestation crates typically seven by two feet in size which confine artificially inseminated female pigs for virtually their entire lives. The use of gestation crates has been banned in multiple states, including California. California’s law has been challenged by industrial animal agriculture industry associations and is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court. This follows multiple lower court decisions where the Animal Legal Defense Fund, as part of a coalition, successfully intervened to defend the law from lawsuits by the industrial agriculture industry.

Further, disturbing U.S. Department of Agriculture noncompliance reports show safety violations where animal carcasses were contaminated with fecal matter and reprocessed. Other documents from litigation also show Hormel’s efforts to use a loophole allowing the company to deceive customers by labeling its products as not having nitrates added while using celery powder as an additive that still ultimately produces nitrates.

Deposition testimony taken during litigation also reveals that one of Hormel’s suppliers of its Natural Choice brand called Wayne Farms renders dead chickens into feed, which it then gives to the company’s chicken growers to feed later generations of chickens. This means that through this process, chickens could be fed parts of their parents, grandparents, or other relatives.

“Hormel has done everything it can to deceive customers looking for ‘natural’ foods by simply changing its branding while continuing to harm animals and put workers and consumers at risk,” Animal Legal Defense Fund’s Executive Director Stephen Wells, said in a statement. “Consumers want to make informed choices that reflect their values, which is why transparency is so critical, and why we have laws to protect consumers from being misled.”

In September 2021, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals revived the case against Hormel Foods after it had initially been dismissed. The appeals court reversed a lower court’s ruling, finding that the Animal Legal Defense Fund has standing to pursue its false advertising claims against Hormel Foods, and that those claims are not preempted by federal animal product labeling laws.

In a watershed ruling for consumer protection of all types, the Court ruled for the first time that the DCCPPA allows qualifying nonprofit organizations to sue to enforce the DCCPPA without having to demonstrate federal court standing. This decision was an important win for consumers as it keeps the doors of Washington D.C. courthouses open for consumer claims.

The 2016 lawsuit was filed following an Animal Legal Defense Fund undercover investigation revealing significant animal neglect and violations of laws protecting both consumers and animals at a Nebraska-based factory farm owned by The Maschhoffs, LLC, a major Illinois-based pig producer and one of Hormel Foods’ largest suppliers.

More on this topic

Popular stories

Breaking! Animals Asia Rescues Last Four Performing Moon Bears From Hanoi Central Circus In Vietnam

Animals Asia has rescued four moon bears, also known as Asiatic Black Bears, from the Hanoi Central Circus in Hanoi, Vietnam. As a sign of a remarkable change in...

Plant-Based Event Menus Can Save Up To 10 Tons Of Climate Pollution According To A New Report

Replacing meat-heavy menu choices with plant-based options can reduce the carbon footprint of a 500-person event by 10 tons of greenhouse gas equivalents, according...

Direct Action Everywhere Supporters Make A Powerful Statement By Disrupting Circus World Baraboo’s Elephant Performance

Wiscnews.com Last Sunday animal activists affiliated with Direct Action Everywhere spoke out at a Circus World performance in Baraboo, Wisconsin chanting “It’s not entertainment, it’s...